Hi friends, I wish to post my response to what Matshwene E. Moshia a member of AYF (African Youths Foundation) wrote on the situations in Zimbabwe. I attached a copy of his (Matshwene's) letter and my response. Thanks.

Matshwene E. Mashia WROTE:

"Comrades, Sisters, Brothers and African Youth in General

My english might not be as fancy as the one of those who have spoken previously and so might be my knowledge of history. Why shoud I worry because I'm not here to exhibit such.

The situation in Zimbawe has made me to loose few droplets of my valuable tears and I am not sure if whether I will ever gain them back or in a way refill my tears tank. Where are African leaders. The Zim issue makes me angry because I have realised that the African leaders have this unprofessional brotherhood thing that fail them to talk when another black brother (president) is acting like a wild animal. That is why Thabo Mbeki and other African leaders are quite about Zimbabwe situation. Mugabe is their "brother" so they can not express their views against him when he is acting so wild.

Mugabe has been a leader in the past and I personally respected him and he was treated with dignity, but today can I ship the same dignity to him? The guy who has superpower over the media and every zimbabwean life?

African leaders spoke openly and boldly about South African situation during apartheid and I was happy even though they were few minutes late. That was because it was a white man who was treating fellow black africans unfairly, but today is black against black and they are silent, why? I have a black skin, but I am missing something here. Does a black skin get hurt more when tortured by a white man than when is tortured by a fellow black man?

We had Africans like Charles Taylor, Idi Amin and today is Robert Gabriel Mugabe and African leaders are still silent. Even Obasanjo was a dictator when he was still in the military. History know him quite well. What is the use of having African Union and .....

Why would we expect the global world to take Africa serious while we (Africans) are not taking each other very serious. In South Africa, a country with a population of approximately 48 million, we have 3 million zimbos and many other people from as far as palestine and middle east but I don't remember the South African government debating about immigration issue seriously. Desmond Tutu has spoken but he i not the president. Maybe African leaders need more caffeine in their systems before they can speak on issues.

Why would we wait for situations to be worse before we speak, and how do we measure worse in this context. Is when million people have died or what scientific or political instrument do we need to measure the degree of how worse the situation is? Africans, I am troubled.

Mugabe has declared openly that George Bush and Tony Blair are his main enemies and we as Africans have also declared openly that poverty and diseases are our major enemies. Mugabe has handed Zimbabweans to enemies (poverty and diseases). Why can't we hand Mugabe for two days only to George Bush and Tony Blair (his enemies) so that he can feel how painful it is to be handed to an enemy (poverty and diseases in african context).

What worries me more is when the previous president of Namibia (Sam Nujoma) is acting as a yes sir to Robert Gabriel Mugabe. A man of his age still saying, yes sir?

From troubled african soul. Matshwene E. Moshia"

**************

My RESPONSE:

Dear Matshwene E. Moshia,

I’m indeed very delighted to read your message titled “ZIMBABWE AND AFRICA LEADERS”. You expressly informed the whole world of your opinion about the issue going on in Zimbabwe, wherein you called “ZIM”. I have some few points to add to all your suggestions and maybe I might be able to shed some lights on some areas in your discourse that I feel are a bit cloudy.

Dear fellow Africans, as for me, I have never thought the problems of Africans are skin related mostly in the context of which my colleague, Matshwene E. Moshia has said it. The major problem with Africans is deeply entrenched in the fact that we tends to assume and re-adjust to every situation so quickly. We have a very high level of self-preservation gene that has made us to relegate ourselves to any prevailing circumstances. I still believe we can utilize these unique virtues in more profitable forms than how we are using it now. If you all see my point, you will realize that Africans must for now or say by now be fully ready to stand up for whatever injustice we tend to be facing. I’ll say, from history, governments in Africa have always been like kingdoms; that is, most of our rulers are always in form of monopolistic hegemonies.

We have for long centuries ago been ruled by the supposed royal families whose decisions had always been finally and supreme to all mortal. As for the case of non-ruling class or say the “subjects”, we tend to always live up to whatever the rulers say or do whether right or wrong. Now going by this belief of our ancestors and our history, the trend has not “really” changed. We still somehow see the people in Government as Kings and we tend to believe whatever they say or do. We still see ourselves as their subjects and are ready to be “quiet” in whatever the situation may be. With all these beliefs, the people in government too see themselves as the lord of the land, the demigod whom must be obeyed anytime any day and in whatever situations.

Sequel to these beliefs that I can say had been running down the trails from centuries and families up to today, the African mentality of government has been formed. This mentality has now encroached deep into our lives and has subjected us to the fact that we can’t do it ourselves than with the help of other supposed foreign powers. On this point, I want to make a point clear, the only people that can help Africa and Africans are Africans not any power outside of Africa. This is subjected to the fact that in whatever the case may be any foreign power will definitely have their motives for been interested in helping. And I must confess the motive most times do not always come in line with the need of Africans. There is what we can the power play, which I think has been relegating my dear continent for the past many decades.

The only form of help to the “African needs” can uncompromisingly come from you. Here I mean from Africans but I’ll say we should always understand what sovereignty means. For it is sure that presidents of other African countries can help in cases within other sister countries but there is always a limitation to these form of helps. So my dear friend who made a case against the South African president, Nigerian president and other African presidents that they have been so silent about the case in “ZIM”, I would say, do you know what cases/problems they too are facing in their own nation(s)? Sometimes these leaders tend to look clean/good or very friendly whenever you see them outside the shores of their state (countries) but deep within most of them, they still embrace the “African Rulership” styles. Please, do not be deceived that a messiah in form of any African leader is coming to help solve the “ZIM” crises but believe that the only right solution will come from within the “ZIM” itself. That is, the citizens should come out and empower themselves to fight corruption from within; by these if the forces within is greater then the forces without (outside) can make effects. By these, I’m not saying most African leaders are corrupt or that those ones I mentioned above are particularly entrenched in corruption, but I’m just making a point that the only right solution to things within any nation mostly in Africa should come from the citizenry. We should never be expecting any other country to save us because; they equally have their own issue(s) to solve.

As for the supposed foreign powers, I’ll advise that we Africans should take our mind off their help. If it comes so be it but otherwise we should make our own case ourselves. My reasons are numerous and with examples. Firstly these people always have a way to play around facts and figures. Sometimes if not most times, they have ulterior motives to their helps and solutions. African should still remember the slave trade eras in our shores. As for examples, I’ll not be specific, but I’ll just say; “look around the world and see for yourself” the countries that THEY have HELPED recently or previously. You may tell me what you see or noticed. The only outside helps that I have seen worked were those that emanated first from within and later taken over from without (outside). By these, the people within have already dictated the pace and directions suitable for them & the foreign power just followed the pace and the directions.

Injustices are easily fought if we take it in simple cases at a time (step by step). Things are not to be rushed. Otherwise it may degenerate into huge violence such as civil wars. Africa has experience more than enough civil wars already I do not pray to add one more to the list. “ZIM” shall be free, but I have a question, what really do you think enters into the hearts of the supposed good/fair people just after they have power? Could it have been the way we (citizens) neglect or fail to challenge ALL their steps and decisions? Could it have been because we tend to just leave them to do whatever they think is good unchallenged. Could it have been the same Ruler ship mentality or the Kingship mentality? Maybe, this is sequel to the citizens’ subjective nature? Maybe any of the above…but I know anybody whose authority is unchallenged will definitely turn to a despot in a matter of time. If a leader knows he/she has a lot to do/deliver or say, lots of challenges from his/her people I believe nobody will have to remind him/her that the time to leave office is close. But as it is in Africa, some of our leaders’ decisions go unchallenged; the seat of power is always too sweet for them because of our nonchalant attitude towards whatever they do (right or wrong) so why should they want to leave. It is part of human nature, so sometimes lets not just sit down and blame this people…but lets brace up to challenge all their steps and decisions, and equally teach our children that the era of kingdoms, dictatorship & despotic ruler ship is over, that they are FREE to contest any decision made by anybody in as much they do this within the context of the law and in orderly manners.

My finally question is that: “will you not change if you get to leadership position? Of course you’ll say YES, but for ever situation you go by everyday, you’re given a leadership role(s). Look very well you’ll see, and ask yourself “am I doing it right?...look into your family; am I doing it right? … If you can’t manage a little people or organization or even yourself how can you do for large group or even a country? Life takes steps and stages. Let’s change the Dictatorship mentalities and FREE ourselves from long time bondage of self guilt and self relegation.

Africans! We can all do it both equally and even better.

Africa shall be free…let’s not rush…every journey starts with a step!

Long live Africa…long live the World.

Temitope Ogunro

Growing speculations in diplomatic quarters that the inability of former Finance/Foreign Affairs Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, to bag the United Nations number two job was instigated from home got further credibility on Monday when an Australian newspaper published that President Olusegun Obasanjo may have scuttled the bid at the last minute.
According to a report on theaustralian.news.com.au written from New York by David Nason, the new UN Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki-moon, was set to announce the name of Okonjo-Iweala as the Deputy Secretary-General but could not secure the requisite endorsement from Obasanjo.
This, according to the report, made the UN boss to look for an easy alternative, a person that would accept the job at short notice. That was how Asha-Rose Migiro, described as "a novice foreign minister in Tanzania for less than a year", came in as a ready substitute.
"The favourite on most lists was former Nigerian Finance and Foreign Minister, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, a highly regarded Harvard-educated economist with senior-level experience at the World Bank.
"One story now circulating is that Ban wanted Okonjo-Iweala but at the last minute, Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo withdrew his support.
"Having already advised the heads of UN regional groups of his intention to appoint an African woman at the end of his first week - briefing papers to this effect were widely circulated - Ban needed to save face.
"So he looked for an African woman who would take the job at short notice. Migiro fitted the bill."
When THISDAY sought the comments of the Senior Special Assistant on Public Affairs to the President, Mrs. Remi Oyo, yesterday, she denied that Obasanjo blocked Okonjo-Iweala.
Oyo said the story could simply not be true, stating emphatically that president Obasanjo did not and could not have blocked Okonjo-Iweala from the job.
Excerpts from the story titled "UN chief 'hits the ground stumbling'" reads:
One of the unlucky features of Ban Ki-moon's first two weeks as UN Secretary-General has been the absence of a traditional media honeymoon period. Instead of some leeway to find his feet, the veteran South Korean diplomat has been on the receiving end almost from day one.
This should not have surprised Ban. The general expectation at UN headquarters in New York was that perceptions of mismanagement, corruption, lack of accountability and missed reform opportunities - the legacy of KofiAnnan's final years as secretary-general - would carry over and deprive Ban of a scepticism-free passage into his new job.
But even allowing for this handicap, Ban's performance in his first two weeks has raised an enormous level of disquiet. "Hit the ground stumbling," was how one insider grimly put it last week. "It's early days, I know, but if I was working in his office right now, I'd be panicking."
Driving such criticisms have been inept media performances and baffling senior appointments that have raised doubts about Ban's ability to lift the UN from its organisational and cultural rut.
Ban came to the UN promising a lot. He was going to give the Secretariat new direction, restore the trust between it and the 192 member nations and making ethics and transparency UN bywords.
But two weeks in, people are beginning to ask if the UN, in stumping for the man known in Seoul as the "slippery eel", has bought a lemon. Nothing his fanned these flames more than Ban's decision to appoint Tanzania's novice foreign minister, Asha-Rose Migiro, as his deputy.
The move has shocked seasoned UN watchers and Ban's feeble attempts to end the controversy last week have only made things worse. Like Annan, who created the deputy's position in 1998 and gave it to former Canadian defence minister, Louise Frechette, Ban wanted a woman for the job. He also hoped to select an African.
The favourite on most lists was former Nigerian finance and foreign minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, a highly regarded Harvard-educated economist withsenior-level experience at the World Bank. Migiro, foreign minister in Tanzania for less than a year, was not considered a contender.
That changed on January 5 when Migiro, chairing a meeting in Lesotho's capital, Maseru, received a phone call from Tanzanian President Kakaya Kikwete. The Secretary-General, Kikwete said, had just called to offer her the deputy's job. The condition was that Migiro accept immediately because Ban wanted to announce the appointment in New York that same day.
Shortly after, Ban reached Migiro on the phone himself. As one East African newspaper put it, she accepted the offer "almost in disbelief".
In New York the reaction was also disbelief. Migiro was an unknown from one of the poorest countries in the world. Before her surprise elevation to foreign minister, her ministerial experience had been limited to a junior social affairs portfolio.
Even her seat in Tanzania's parliament was questionable - being reserved solely for women.
And those who did know Migiro said she was shy and retiring, polar opposite character traits to her predecessor, Briton Mark Malloch Brown. Most importantly, Migiro had little background in management, yet Ban was entrusting her with one of the most difficult management jobs imaginable: the day-to-day oversight of the entire weird and wonderful UN bureaucracy.
Once it emerged that Migiro had won the job without any formal discussion about her role and had last year publicly supported Iran's nuclear ambitions, and expressed hope that Tanzanian uranium might one day feed Tehran's reactors, the battle was on.
For the best part of a week, Ban's official spokesperson was under siege asthe UN press corp demanded moreinformation about the Migiro selection process.
Last Thursday, when Ban held his first official media conference, he was able to answer for himself. "There was some report about Dr Migiro, whom I have chosen as the Deputy Secretary-General," Ban began.
"I have worked with her closely as a counterpart, each as foreign minister of our respective countries.
"Coincidentally, I was flying together with her on an airplane from a certain point to Tanzania while I was going to visit Tanzania.
"We were sitting together. We spent at least six hours talking together, knowing each other. I have engaged in many more discussions with her, and I have known her."
It was neither a full nor credible explanation and the impression left was of someone reluctant to be open and honest. It was also at odds with Migiro's claims, reported in Africa, that she met Ban only once, at a reception in Seoul, prior to being offered the job.
Nowhere has Migiro mentioned an intimate six-hour flight. One story now circulating is that Ban wanted Okonjo-Iweala but at the last minute Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo withdrew his support.
Having already advised the heads of UN regional groups of his intention to appoint an African woman at the end of his first week - briefing papers to this effect were widely circulated - Ban needed to save face.
So he looked for an African woman who would take the job at short notice. Migiro fitted the bill.
The $US18 million ($23.1million) in aid South Korea gave Tanzania last year - Korean aid had totalled just $US4.7million between 1991-2003 - helped convince Kikwete to give up his foreign minister.
How much truth is in this story will be clearer over time, but the mere fact that it is circulating is damaging to Ban and Migiro.
The Tanzanian is due to arrive in New York later today but, remarkably, Ban's office says there won't be any media appearances before she officially begins her duties next month.
(www.thisdayonline.com)

Herein below are some reasons for th rift between Obasanjo and Okonjo-Iweala; as posted by www.vanguardngr.com:

Why Okonjo-Iweala resigned:
ABUJA — FOREIGN Affairs Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala resigned, yesterday, in what was interpreted in political circles as the climax of her resentment of some happenings in the polity.

She was re-assigned to the Foreign Affairs Ministry from the Finance Ministry (her familiar terrain) only six weeks ago.
President Olusegun Obasanjo immediately accepted her resignation and praised her for her “unparalleled patriotism, dedication and loyalty.”

Although Dr. Okonjo-Iweala cited “compelling need to take care of pressing family issues” as reason for her exit, Vanguard gathered authoritatively that, that could not have been all to it. According to sources, soon after she came on board in 2003 as Finance Minister from her job as Vice President at the World Bank in the USA, Okonjo-Iweala tendered her letter of resignation. The reason at that time was irreconcilable differences with her boss.
But her father, a distinguished intellectual, was said to have stepped in, pleading with the President to ignore the letter.

Once she settled down to work, she worked tirelessly to secure debt relief for the country from its creditors especially the Paris Club.
President Obasanjo acknowledged this in accepting her resignation letter yesterday when he said through the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Uffot Ekaette: “You were able to utilise the vast network and experience of over 20 years at the World Bank to contribute to getting our nation the debt relief that had eluded us for so long. You delivered on all the tasks and targets set for you in that sector.”

As Finance Minister, she was also chairperson, Economic Management Team. Then came the last cabinet reshuffle that saw her redeployed to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, a development that did not appear to go down well with her.
Sources said she believed that with all she had achieved in the ministry, she ought to have been given an opportunity to continue and besides, she thought that in the Finance ministry she was on a familiar terrain.

Things refused to get better between her and President Obasanjo who once acknowledged that she wept openly before him in her bid to secure debt relief for Nigeria from the Paris Club.
On assumption of office at the Foreign Affairs Ministry, she announced uncovering alleged fraud of $4.6 million at the ministry. The Presidency swiftly dismissed her claims, clearing her predecessor in the Ministry, Ambassador Olu Adeniji, of any wrong doing.

A statement issued by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Chief Ekaette said “...her reference to the $4.6 million transfer to an international organisation, namely the International Sea-bed Authority, has been mischievously publicised to imply a cover-up in the ministry until she discovered it.

“This is incorrect. Nevertheless, it has unfortunately been made to reflect negatively on the conduct and integrity of the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Olu Adeniji.”
Ekaette said the fact of the matter was that the sum of $4.6 million was in March 2006 sent to the International Sea-bed Authority by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs instead of $22,000.
He said the head of the authority alerted Nigerian High Commissioner in Jamaica of the excessive amount sent to the authority and the high commissioner alerted the then Minister of Foreign Affairs (Adeniji) and the President.

The former Finance Minister saw this as public humiliation of her personality. She later retracted her statement, claiming she was misquoted by the press.
But the last straw was her final disengagement as Chairperson of the National Economic Management Team on Monday. Her position was taken by the Finance Minister, Mrs Esther Nenadi Usman.

However, Governor Orji Kalu of Abia State added a new dimension to the development when he told reporters in Lagos yesterday that Dr Okonjo-Iweala was instigated by policy makers in the United States of America because of her re-deployment from the Finance Ministry
The ex-minister although a Deltan by birth is married to an Abia and represented the state in the cabinet.

US policy makers instigate her, says Kalu
The resignation of Dr. Okonjo-Iweala was instigated by policy makers in the United States of America because of her re-deployment from the Finance Ministry, according to Gov. Kalu of Abia State.
The governor, who spoke in an interview in Lagos shortly on arrival from the United States, said policy and law makers in America believed her re-deployment from the Finance Ministry was to pave the way for last minute looting of the treasury by the present government.

According to him, Dr. Okonji-Iweala was removed from Finance Ministry, not because she was incompetent, but because government had something else up its sleeves.
Kalu, who noted that he expected Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala’s resignation, said: “I never believed that when they removed Okonjo-Iweala from the Finance Ministry that she would stay. I spoke with policy makers in Washington, the state department and the White House.

“I expected the resignation and the resignation was discussed in Washington by both lawmakers and policy executioners. I knew Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala would go because the government is trying to take all the money now and side-track her.

“Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala has done the right thing and I congratulate her for resigning from a government that is not workable; from a government that is very corrupt and I have told everybody that this government is very corrupt.”

Obasanjo accepts resignation
Accepting her resignation, President Obasanjo in a letter signed by the SGF to Dr Okonjo-Iweala said: “Mr. President wishes to acknowledge the unparalleled patriotism, dedication and loyalty that you displayed throughout your tenure, first as Minister of Finance and lately as Minister of Foreign Affairs.”

Noting the achievements recorded during her tenure as Finance Minister and Chairperson, Economic Management Team, he praised her “for the success of the reform programme in the finance sector with clearly visible results being applauded world wide and by all Nigerians. You were able to utilise the vast network and experience of over 20 years at the World Bank to contribute to getting our nation the debt relief that had eluded us so long. You delivered on all the tasks and targets set for you in that sector by Mr. President. At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, you have within this short time set a tone for a transformation of the Ministry. This administration will certainly miss you

“Mr. President believes that although you left the cabinet, you will as a patriotic Nigerian continue to make positive contributions to the development of your beloved country and wishes you every success in your future endeavours,” he said.

Senator express mixed feelings
The resignation of Dr Okonjo-Iweala from the Federal Executive Council yesterday elicited mixed reactions from Senators with some commending her and others expressing reservations that her policies did little to alleviate the lot of the common man.
While some of the lawmakers appraised her performance in the cabinet as helpful to the improvement of the nation’s foreign economic profile including the reduction of the nation’s external debts, some said a proper assessment would only be given after the present administration.

Among those who commented yesterday were Senators Baba Tela (PDP, Bauchi North), Emmanuel Azu Agboti (PDP, Ebonyi South), Farouk Bello (ANPP, Kebbi Central), Badamaisi Maccido (ANPP, Sokoto North), Abubakar Maikafi (PDP, Bauchi South) and Joy Emodi (PDP, Anambra North).

Senator Tela: “I think she will be remembered as one of the most vibrant Finance ministers that we ever had. She was confident. She was focused even though when she came in she had a problem to get Nigeria out of the debt trap. She succeeded in ensuring that our debt profile was totally reduced and I think she will go down in memory lane as one of the ministers who really took Nigeria out of serious economic problems and wherever she finds herself, she will be well received.”

Senator Agboti: “Mrs Okonji-Iweala is a woman of substance. She was very careful in her approach to national issues and in my opinion, for her service overrides any other consideration. We will miss her.”

Senator Farouk Bello: “I think that is the most honourable thing for her to have done. This is on the basis that she had been leading the Economic Team and two things could have happened. If she had performed well, there is no reason for removing her but removing her would mean that the President has lost confidence in her in one way or the other.”

Okonjo-Iweala cites family reason
Speaking on her resignation on television last night, she affirmed that she was leaving to “take care of my family and Mr. President has been gracious enough to allow me leave.”
She was “grateful for the opportunity to serve” and described her experience in government as wonderful. She was also “grateful to God and all Nigerians.”
(www.vanguardngr.com)

It is common knowledge that one does not dowse fire using a flammable fluid
like petrol - people would consider you a lunatic. Applying petrol instead
of water to fire will only lead to more fire and therefore more destruction.
Similarly, an army that is not focused on a common goal - resolving the
conflict - will most certainly lose any battle. A war is an emergency
situation that requires the utmost diligence, discipline and commitment. In
the course of pursuing the enemy, some soldiers may want to satisfy their
various selfish desires in the battlefront. They might be preoccupied with
looting, pillaging and other violent fantasies of varying natures. While
they enter a country in a "saviour's" uniform with the supposed purpose of
achieving peace, they busy themselves raping, stealing and looting from the
very people they are meant to protect. Furthermore, as they engage in these
pursuits, the enemy might remobilise and counter-attack causing serious
casualties - not because of inferior weaponry, but because of hypocrisy.

Ever heard of False Prophets? People who preach what they can't practice?
Wolves in sheep skins? They proclaim a message of hope and victory but they
don't have any of their own testimony to give credibility to their message.
They may believe the message but they want the message to minister "truth
and change" to others when it hasn't yet achieved the same in their own
lives. They continue to proclaim the message to people just because they are
employed to do so - the case of "Zantchito mentality" [1]. What they don't
realise is that messages that lack corresponding testimony in the speaker's
life often do not carry power to cause genuine change in people's lives.
People may be impressed by the articulate speaker but his information will
not spark a conviction that leads to a decision for change. Remember the
adage: "Until conception takes place, pregnancy cannot occur". In other
words, empty words (words without corresponding testimony) do not lead to
sustainable change in people's attitude, values, perceptions or behaviour.

It is not, therefore, too surprising that as nations of the world we are
struggling miserably to contain the impact of HIV and AIDS, especially in
the third world. We are attacking the enemy from all fronts, but with very
minimal success. Governments, non-governmental organisations (NGOs),
community-based organisations (CBOs), chiefs, local assemblies, faith-based
organisations (FBOs), donors and local communities are all proclaiming
messages of prevention and mitigation of the impact of HIV and AIDS.
Billions of dollars from local and international sources have been diverted
>from addressing education and food security issues towards the HIV and AIDS
fight. Despite all these efforts, the "enemy" remains hugely illusive as
most third world nations slide deeper into the quagmire of poverty.
Conferences costing millions have been held to assess progress in the fight,
and different strategies have been mooted to help address the HIV and AIDS
puzzle. I have attended many of these conferences and meetings and read many
reports on the same. Not one of them confesses that we are experiencing
little progress in the fight because we have too many False Prophets in our
ranks. I feel that there are too many counterfeit stakeholders in the fight,
and that it is impossible to make genuine progress until they are identified
and rooted out. Hypocrisy has no place in this struggle. It is a noble fight
that requires genuine soldiers, who have the heart and mind to battle using
self-knowledge and experience - these are soldiers who are ready to live by
example.

In July 2005, I attended an annual review conference of the Government of
Malawi/UNICEF-funded prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT)
project being implemented in the Mwanza district in Southern Malawi intended
to promote participation of men in PMTCT for HIV prevention and AIDS
mitigation. It was a well-attended meeting with over 200 stakeholders
participating, including chiefs, volunteers, youth, government personnel,
and donor representatives, among others. Government officials preached a
powerful message on the need for men to support their wives by escorting
them to antenatal clinics, making decisions on HIV testing, using condoms
during pregnancy if diagnosed HIV-positive, providing proper nutrition
during pregnancy, and enhancing sex quality in marriage, etc. Married
couples dubbed "role models" and drawn from parts of the district gave
powerful testimonies of how they have embraced the ideologies being
propagated by the project.

In the course of the session, one junior chief posed a very interesting
question that invited an unexpectedly deafening burst of applause from
participants - he wanted to find out if, amongst the project promoters
(mostly government health personnel), there were any who would give their
own corresponding testimony regarding adoption of what they were preaching
to participants so as to encourage them. You may be able to guess what
answer was given to this probing, yet simple, enquiry - silence...and then
one long, vague explanation that simply did not respond to the
question...followed by an excuse that time was running out and there was a
need to complete the remaining business of the day. The question sounded
simple, but the response told a different story, and that is because, I am
sure, they did not practice what they preached. Similarly, their
presentations completely lacked personal and family-level testimonies to
illustrate the messages they were preaching.

There are so many stakeholders in the HIV and AIDS fight today who preach
use of condoms but who then themselves indulge in unsafe sex. Some may
question my assertion on the basis that sex takes place in secret, but I can
assure you that there are many HIV/AIDS activists who promoted safe sex
practices for many years but have since died of the same or have since
contracted the virus while on the battlefront. There are numerous youth NGOs
and CBOs that promote sexual abstinence until marriage, but I can assure you
very few of them would manage to give you a formula to which they themselves
ascribe which might stimulate their listeners to join them in also adopting
safer sex practices. I talked to youth group leaders who were attending a
workshop on how to implement the National HIV/AIDS Policy early in 2006 at
Joe's Motel in Mchinji district of Central Malawi, asking them what
prescription they give to their clients to enable them to abstain from sex
before marriage as an HIV prevention measure. They had no answer, and yet
they have been preaching this message for years. I also had the opportunity
to attend one of the National Youth Council annual conferences held at
Natural Resources College in Lilongwe district of Central Malawi in 2002.
The risky character and behaviour portrayed by leaders of the youth
organisations attending the meeting made me wonder if the message of
abstinence that came from their mouths in the conference deliberations was
really worth promoting. Mind you, these were leaders, and leaders are
expected to be role models to bring credibility to their guidance and
counseling agenda. No wonder many parents in Malawi today wouldn't dare
allow their children to join youth groups in the country for fear of
contracting the highly contagious "character". It is a waste of donor
resources to take such soldiers to the battlefront - they are hypocrites and
will only expose the army to the enemy.

Today, workshops are held in many countries to discuss behaviour change
strategies to address the impacts of HIV and AIDS. The people who preach in
such workshops rarely have anything to show at a personal or family level to
prove practicability of their solutions. It's all academic or sheer
hullabaloo. At nightfall, the well-learned men and women get to the business
of fetching prostitutes and "men of the night". Today, it is common to find
divorcees or people with dysfunctional marriages preaching strategies to
enhance marriage life for HIV prevention. Their audiences can't believe what
they say because their messages carry no substance at all.

It is time that nations take an honest look at the kind of enemy we are
fighting. It is time we realise that HIV and AIDS is creating hopelessness,
quiet resignation, and despair in the lives of many, including my fellow
Malawians. In Malawi, people are gripped by fear for their own and other
people's lives. People cannot continue on this path. The main challenge in
the fight today may no longer be HIV/AIDS itself. Rather it may be the False
Prophets we are breeding in our midst who are, despite their messages,
actually impeding efforts on the battlefront. It is high time we examined
the quality of our soldiers on the battlefront. The financial resources
available are adequate enough to register significant progress in the war,
even in the third world. Knowledge about HIV/AIDS prevention and mitigation
has spread to most countries through various media outlets and strategies.
The question is, how much impact or change has this achieved? It is now time
that our efforts at coordination are directed at reforming the leadership
base to uproot counterfeit soldiers so that genuine soldiers are able to
continue the fight. Genuine leaders can no longer be identified only by
examining their management capacity or technical capacity; it is high time
that other leadership selection criteria/guidelines are deployed and that
the leaders we choose practice what they preach. We will never manage to
dowse the HIV/AIDS fire by using petrol.

[1] Zantchito mentality = "I don't care; moreover I do it only for the sake
of fulfilling my employment obligations."

Sources: African Youths Foundation; Peter Jere (member); The Drum Beat.

Increased susceptibility to infections due to vitamin A deficiency (VAD), is a leading cause of about 80,000 deaths among Nigerian children annually.
This figure was provided in Dutse, by Jigawa State coordinator of the National Food and Drugs Administration and Control (NAFDAC), Mr Abdulsalam Ozigis, at an event organised by the agency to discuss the role of regulatory agencies in the elimination of the deficiency.
He said the UNICEF/MI report on minerals and vitamin deficiency in Nigeria revealed that 80,000 children die each year in Nigeria from increased susceptibility to infections due to vitamin A deficiency, adding that 25 per cent of Nigerian children are growing without enough immunity. This, according to the report, leads to frequent illnesses and poor growth.
He also said no fewer than 30,000 children under the age of five years have died over the years, directly as a result of Vitamin A Deficiency. This, he said, represents about 25 per cent of total deaths within the years in which they died.
Ozigis said high incidents of deaths directly and indirectly linked to VAD, informed NAFDAC’s commitment to the vitamin A fortification programme.
He said adequate measures are being taken to avoid frequent illnesses and poor growth in children, which is why the Agency directed that all edibles must be fortified by manufacturers at point of manufacture, adding that a recently launched "progress for children report card on nutrition" by UNICEF, showed that Nigeria is moving at a very slow pace of 2.2per cent a year in the fortification programme.
He said the report also showed that 29 per cent out of the 43 per cent under-weight children in the West/Central African region is attributable to Nigeria alone.
Ozigis said NAFDAC was committed to reversing this trend urgently.
According to him, the overall goal of the agency is to reduce the mortality and morbidity rates among children in the 6 to 59 months age bracket, and contribute positively towards the achievement of part of the country’s Millennium Development Goals (MDG's).
Vitamin A, a fat-soluble vitamin, is involved in the formation and maintenance of healthy skin, hair, and mucous membranes. Vitamin A helps to see in dim light and is necessary for proper bone growth, tooth development, and reproduction.

Curtesy Thisdayonline.com (a Nigerian News Media)

Hi Friends, last week Friday, a US TV giant ABC, showed the world a report on the rate of internet crime in Nigeria. The report was so shocking and very disturbing.

Herein is as it is reported by one of the Nigerian daily papers "Punch News", in their Monday edition.
www.punchontheweb.com

"American TV network says Lagos is big for nothing"
By Our correspondent
Published: Monday, 11 Dec 2006

AS far as a leading American TV network is concerned, Lagos is a big for nothing and crime-ridden city with 20 million people mostly illiterate and poverty stricken, Empowered Newswire reports.

That was how ABC, one of America‘s three biggest TV networks, described Lagos in an investigative 20/20 report last Friday evening.

Only last week, Nigeria‘s Information Minister, Mr. Frank Nweke Jnr, and two other collegaues visited the United States capital to launch the Federal Government‘s Heart of Africa, which is meant to address the image problem of Nigeria in the US

In a stinging report on 419 fraud among Nigerians at home and in the United States, the ABC report-20/20-an investigative programme broadcast on Friday even played parts of a musical video and soundtrack of the movie, ”The Master” which depicted how 419 operatives conduct their fraud.

The report played clips from the film and from the musical video, even drawing from the words used in the musical that 419 victims were the ”muguns”, and the 419 operatives the masters. The report blamed the film and the music video for celebrating 419 and treating their kingpins ”folk heroes.” The report said the film mocks the ”muguns.”

The programme was broadcast on Friday evening, getting US-based Nigerians worried and troubled.

A Nigerian Lawyer in the US said by the next day he had received several calls from his clients and partners asking questions about the report on Nigeria.

Others feared that on resumption of work on Monday, their colleagues would bombard them with all kinds of questions and even negative attitude as a result of the ABC report.

Presented by Brian Ross, the report which took about 30 minutes including commercial breaks, presented how Nigerian 419 agents in the US lay prey for their American victims, showing scenes in Washington DC, Dallas and California where the ABC investigative teams confronted some of them on camera having disguised as willing victims of the 419 game.

At first, the 419 operatives were not aware they were being filmed by undercover cameras. Once they knew they were on films, they turned apologetic and repentant.

The ABC report did not show whether the investigative team turned the 419 operatives to the police.

But the most telling part of the report was the ABC‘s team‘s visit to Lagos, which the report said, had a population of 20 million. Showing parts of Oshodi, the report described Lagos as a ”crime-ridden disgrace of a city.”

Before visiting Nigeria, the ABC news team had played along with the 419 operatives and promised to send advance cash of $12,000 to Lagos after receiving a letter from the email that promised them $25m once they send the advance fee.

The ABC team parked monopoly paper money in a DHL box and sent it to Lagos. They arrived with their teams and proceeded to a DHL office where someone had come to claim the mail and there the ABC team confronted the 419 accomplice who had by now picked up the box mailed by the American reporters from the US.

The ABC report also showed how 419 operatives used Internet cafes in Lagos to send mass e-mails to Americans preying on what the report accurately described as the ”greed” of the Americans themselves.

Although the report said there were scams all over the world from Europe to Nigeria, this report focussed primarily on what it called ”Nigerian scams.”

Only last week, Nweke while speaking with Nigerian press in the US, said Nigeria continued to be unfairly profiled.

Although he and Nigerians abroad acknowledged the existence of 419 operatives at home and in the US, they still argued that such Nigerians were being isolated in a world where criminals minds are not the exclusive afflictions of one country.